[ad_1]
Has Emily Ratajkowski been doing her vogue homework?
In March 2004, John Galliano debuted an autumn/winter assortment for Dior which seemed as if it had been located in an Elvis-does-Vegas time warp, introducing humongous Poiret-style fur-collared coats into the rockabilly canon of neon leopard spot. It wasn’t one of many designer’s most well-known choices, however it might nonetheless learn as pure Galliano: bewitched with all of the cold-blooded angle of an old-world vogue illustration dropped at life.
Gotham
Some magazines on the time questioned whether or not the designer had lent too far into visible histrionics. “It was, as usual, taken to the absolute theatrical max—which produced only an exhausted sense of been there, done that,” wrote Vogue's Sarah Mower in her analysis of the gathering. “Fashion, especially now, needs to be astonished by new approaches to creating beauty for modern times.” Quick ahead 20 years and Emily Ratajkowski appears to have finished simply that: aligning the bombast of a lime, leopard-print skirt with the aesthetics of 2024.
The mannequin was yesterday afternoon photographed in a bias-cut skirt from that very same assortment with Puma Speedcats—a low-rise sneaker that may likely rival the omnipresence of the Adidas Samba—a padded Loewe purse and a behemoth Alison Lou ring. And, within the custom of one more theatrical vogue thoughts—ie, Julia Fox—EmRata's vest seemed as if it had been scissored right into a crop high. Not unhealthy for somebody that once mistook Galliano’s newspaper costume for a Jean Paul Gaultier design. (Hear, I've finished worse…)
This text first appeared on British Vogue.
